Classic Social Psychology Articles
From PsychWiki - A Collaborative Psychology Wiki
JSwim (Talk | contribs) (→Methods) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Critiques of social psychology == | == Critiques of social psychology == | ||
| - | *[[ | + | *[[Philosophical critiques]] |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
== Methods == | == Methods == | ||
*[[Classic articles on External validity]] | *[[Classic articles on External validity]] | ||
| - | *[[Classic articles on Ethics]] | + | *[[Classic articles on Ethics|Classic articles on Research Ethics]] |
*[[Classic articles on Statistical methods]] | *[[Classic articles on Statistical methods]] | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
== Intrapersonal processes == | == Intrapersonal processes == | ||
| Line 30: | Line 25: | ||
*[[Classic articles on Helping behavior]] | *[[Classic articles on Helping behavior]] | ||
*[[Classic articles on Aggression]] | *[[Classic articles on Aggression]] | ||
| - | |||
== Processes within groups == | == Processes within groups == | ||
| Line 47: | Line 41: | ||
*[[Classic articles on Psychology and Law]] | *[[Classic articles on Psychology and Law]] | ||
*[[Classic articles on Environmental psychology]] | *[[Classic articles on Environmental psychology]] | ||
| + | *[[Classic articles on population psychology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:43, 27 June 2010
There are many articles that can be considered classics in social psychology. This is evidenced by many readers over the years that include classic articles as well as the readers themselves becoming classic. Below is a subset of these articles. At this time, they have admittedly, been subjectively. Future elaborations may included more objective determinants of what should be included in the list.
The summaries are not intended to be abstracts of the articles. Rather they are intended to briefly convey the essence of the article (e.g., in 10 words or less)and a brief statement about why the article is a classic. Following this could be a short paragraph (about 3 to 5 sentences) that describes the article, focusing on the aspects of the article that make it a classic, not for instance, detailed description of independent and dependent variables and a listing of all the studies that were done.
Contents |
Critiques of social psychology
Methods
- Classic articles on External validity
- Classic articles on Research Ethics
- Classic articles on Statistical methods
Intrapersonal processes
- Classic articles on Attitudes
- Classic articles on Stereotypes and prejudices
- Classic articles on Attribution and Impression formation
- Classic articles on Decision making
- Classic articles on Affect and Emotions
- Classic articles on the Self
- Classic articles on Sex and Gender
Interpersonal processes
- Classic articles on Self-presentation
- Classic articles on Interpersonal relationships
- Classic articles on Helping behavior
- Classic articles on Aggression
Processes within groups
- Classic articles on groups influencing on performance
- Classic articles on groups influencing attitudes, beliefs, & behaviors?
- Classic articles on groups (in)effectiveness
Intergroup processes
- Classic articles on prejudice, discrimination, and Intergroup relations
- Classic articles on stereotypes influencing behaviors
- Classic articles on improving intergroup experiences/decrease prejudice?
- Classic articles on targets of prejudice and stereotypes?
